Soap Box

To the editor,

I urge all voters to re-elect Allison Aichele as La Plata County Treasurer. Allison deserves to keep the job to ensure the continued effective operations of the treasurer’s office. She has the experience and knowledge of all the complex systems and has upgraded and improved the operations of the office producing the best possible results. She has the professional education and high-level financial management experience that her opponent lacks. It would be a huge mistake to change horses midstream given Allison’s strong leadership and quality performance heading the department. She has been unfairly maligned with trivial and outdated charges, and has proven by all financial audits that she has successfully managed this important department. Financial audits are done on the office annually by the county, as well as other entities’ auditors, such as school districts, cities and towns, etc. Under Allison’s leadership, all La Plata County accounts balance to the penny, confirmed by all the auditors. Please join me in voting to re-elect Allison Aichele for La Plata County Treasurer.

– Daniel Morgenstern, Durango

To the Editor:

Voters have 13 statewide ballot issues to decide on in the Nov. 6 election. Did you know that the paragraph you see on the ballot is usually not the actual thing you are voting on?

You need to know the actual wording to make a good decision. It’s in the Blue Book that the state mails out, that you should have already gotten.

Case in point is Amendment 74 that requires compensation to any private property owner, if local government regs de-value said property, meaning interfere with profit maximization. This would affect both townies and rural residents. The paragraph on the ballot sounds nice: get the evil government out of our lives and our property rights.

Beware. The actual wording of Am. 74 will have you scratching your head and thinking, “Huh?? What the heck does this mean??” It was created by oil and gas interests so they could do anything anywhere. Of course the wording doesn’t mention oil and gas interests. That could turn off some voters. So the amendment would apply to anything anyone wants to do anywhere.

Imagine the worst possible use that could go in next door, that could destroy your enjoyment of living on your land & sharply de-value your property. Factory hog farm? Toxic waste dump? Rural venue for motorcycle rallies, death metal concerts, dirt bike trails & the like? A strip club? A pot shop? Out of state landowner who could care less about the community impacts? Out of state corporation?

As a constitutional amendment, when glitches or unforeseen consequences arise, it usually takes another statewide vote to fix those. This is a lawyer’s dream. Beware.

– Carole McWilliams, Bayfield

To the editor,

We live on a small farm that is around 45 miles from the Sheriff Office. We seldom see deputies in our area, and it was a far safer feeling when BP paid extra to have deputies patrol. Deputies, in addition to deterring crime, have also been helpful with irrigation water disputes, slowing down the fast gas well traffic on the gravel roads, and occasionally chasing stock off the road & preventing accidents. Our Sheriff’s Department cannot continue to lose so many deputies. All divisive politics aside, it is time for a new Sherriff that will provide new morale and pay more attention to farmers and ranchers in the more rural areas.

– Greg Gummersall, La Plata County