Prop 129 is dangerous for pets

We are writing to express our concerns about Proposition 129, which proposes the creation of Veterinary Professional Associates (VPAs) with minimal training. As local veterinarians, we are deeply concerned about the risks this poses to pet health and safety. This measure would allow individuals with only two years of mostly online training to treat illnesses and perform surgery on pets. These trainees will have only one semester and one internship of hands-on clinical training and surgical exposure. This is highly inadequate. 

It is important to note that corporations and special interest groups have pushed this initiative, misleadingly presenting it as a grassroots effort. 

Instead of creating a new role, Colorado veterinarians have urged the Legislature to expand the capacity of our Certified Veterinary Technicians (CVTs). Recent laws have been enacted to allow us to broaden the scope of practice for CVTs, who currently have more hands-on clinical experience than VPAs would receive. By legally empowering CVTs, we can enhance veterinary care without compromising safety. 

We strongly encourage the community to vote no on Proposition 129 for the safety of our animals. This letter is also supported by the following local veterinarians:  Jennifer Schoedler, Alpine Animal Hospital; Jennifer Deming, Aspen Tree Animal Care; Brian Marshall, Bakers Bridge Veterinary Clinic;  Chuck Hawman, Durango Animal Hospital; Amanda Hawkins, Home Sweet Home; and Jessica Brooks and Shannon Mazur, Riverview Animal Hospital. 

 – Randy Hays, DVM, Riverview Animal Hospital