Salka fights for all rural citizens

We must recognize the differences between County Commissioner Matt Salka and his opponent Paul Black. Watching forums and reading letters to the editor reveal two very distinct candidates. I recently learned that Paul Black and fellow Republican Clark Craig (candidate for HD59) support “Moms for Liberty” and “Gays Against Groomers.”

Matt Salka lives in rural Bayfield, yet comments have wrongly suggested that “rural” candidates are needed to balance BOCC. “Rural” must be code for those who would benefit from deregulations like large ranch owners, realtors, water attorneys, GOP executive members and NOT all the citizens of La Plata County.  Four years ago, “rural” residents packed the fairgrounds to protest a proposed land use code. The code we have now is a reflection of what those residents wanted – balancing growth while protecting the rural character of our county. Since then, Matt Salka has worked hard to update the code, ensuring it better serves both residents and businesses.

Matt’s commitment goes beyond land use. He directed funds to help Pine River Shares purchase a farm, providing Pine River Valley residents with year-round access to local produce. This shows Matt’s dedication to improving quality of life for all residents.

In contrast, Paul Black has the backing of those who seek deregulation, potentially leading to unchecked development that benefits a few at the expense of responsible growth.

Matt Salka is the candidate who listens, acts and prioritizes our community’s long-term future – and doesn’t support any hate groups. Vote to re-elect Matt Salka.

– Karen Pontius, Durango